Web Survey Bibliography
Title Evaluation Results from a Pilot Test of a Computerized Self-Administered Questionnaire (CSAQ) for the 1994 Industrial Research and Development (R&D) Survey
Source U.S. Census Bureau
Year 1995
Access date 14.07.2004
Full text pdf (216k)
Abstract We performed this evaluation to determine whether economic respondents could quickly, easily and accurately provide data using a CSAQ. We conclude from our evaluation that, although both the Bureau of the Census and R&D Survey respondents consider CSAQ and electronic reporting the way of the future, the PEDRO/CASES CSAQ system used for the pilot test is not appropriate for implementation at the Census Bureau. We did receive user feedback and identification of improvements necessary for a CSAQ system to be a viable data collection tool and consequently, we recommend continued research into CSAQ authoring and communications alternatives. Our conclusion is based on an analysis of several factors. An analysis comparing the response rate of companies that received the CSAQ to companies that received the paper questionnaire found that the CSAQ companies had a significantly lower response rate. Some companies that received a CSAQ did not respond using a CSAQ because they either had problems with the CSAQ system or perceived that this type of reporting would be more difficult. This problem occurred even after the test universe was restricted to cases interested in CSAQ reporting and that according to responses to a screener questionnaire, appeared to have the hardware/software necessary to use the system we were testing. The CSAQ had edits built into the instrument and thus allowed respondents to correct their data prior to sending us the completed instrument. This is seen as an advantage for us (better data quality and less review) and as an advantage for the respondent (fewer follow-up calls concerning edit failures). We re-edited the data and found the CSAQ panel edit failure rate was significantly lower than the control panel rate. The cost of the mailout package for the CSAQ (postage, material, diskettes, and envelopes) was approximately nine times higher than the mailout cost of a paper questionnaire. In the future, there might be cost savings associated with a CSAQ instrument when compared to the mailout cost for surveys where boxes of questionnaires are mailed to companies that report for all of their establishments.
Access/Direct link Homepage - U.S. Census Bureau (full text)
Year of publication1995
Bibliographic typeReports, seminars
Web survey bibliography - Reports, seminars (231)
- Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys 2016; 2016
- Standard Definitions Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys; 2016
- FocusVision 2015 Annual MR Technology Report; 2016; Macer, T., Wilson, S.
- Establishing the accuracy of online panels for survey research; 2016; Bruggen, E.; van den Brakel, J.; Krosnick, J. A.
- Mixing modes of data collection in Swiss social surveys: Methodological report of the LIVES-FORS mixed...; 2016; Roberts, C.; Joye, D.; Staehli, M. E.
- Assessment of Innovations in Data Collection Technology for Understanding Society; 2016; Couper, M. P.
- Report of the Inquiry into the 2015 British general election opinion polls; 2016; Sturgis, P., Baker, N., Callegaro, M., Fisher, St., Green, J., Jennings, W., Kuha, J., Lauderdale, B...
- Evaluating a New Proposal for Detecting Data Falsification in Surveys; 2016; Simmons, K.; Mercer, A. W.; Schwarzer, S.; Courtney, K.
- Computer-assisted and online data collection in general population surveys; 2016; Skarupova, K.
- Predictive inference for non-probability samples: a simulation study ; 2016; Buelens, B.; Burger, J.; van den Brakel, J.
- ESOMAR/GRBN Online Research Guideline; 2015
- App vs. Web for Surveys of Smartphone Users: Experimenting with mobile apps for signal-contingent experience...; 2015; McGeeney, K.; Keeter, S.; Igielnik, R.; Smith, A.; Rainie, L.
- On Climbing Stairs Many Steps at a Time: The New Normal in Survey Methodology; 2015; Dillman, D. A.
- Polling Error in the 2015 UK General Election: An Analysis of YouGov’s Pre and Post-Election Polls...; 2015; Wells, A.; Rivers, D.
- GreenBook Research Industry Trends Report; 2015; Murphy, L. (Ed.)
- Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys 2015; 2015
- Methodology of the RAND Mid-Term 2014 Election Panel; 2015; Carman, K. G; Pollack, S.
- 28 Questions to Help Buyers of Online Samples; 2015; Cape, P. J.; Phillips, A.; Baker, R.; Cooke, M.; Ribeiro, E.; Terhanian, G.
- Understanding Society Innovation Panel Wave 7: Results from Methodological Experiments; 2015; Blom, A. G.; Burton, J.; Booker, C. L.; Cernat, A.; Fairbrother, M.; Jaeckle, A.; Kaminska, O.; Keusch...
- Tips for Creating Web Surveys for Completion on a Mobile Device; 2015; McGeeney, K.
- U.S. Survey Research: Sampling; 2015
- A Comparison of Different Online Sampling Approaches for Generating National Samples; 2014; Heen, M. S. J., Lieberman, J. D., Miethe, T. D.
- FocusVision 2014 Annual MR Technology Report; 2014; Macer, T., Wilson, S.
- The Changing Landscape of Technology and its Effect on Online Survey Data Collection; 2014; Mitchell, N.
- Query on Data Collection for Social Surveys; 2014; Blanke, K., Luiten, A.
- The role of email addresses and email contact in encouraging web response in a mixed mode design ; 2014; Cernat, A., Lynn, P.
- Mixed-mode surveys of the general population - Results from the European Social Survey mixed-mode experiment...; 2014; Park, A., Humphrey, A.
- Mixed-Mode Designs bei Erhebungen mit sensitiven Fragen: Einfluss auf das Teilnahme- und Antwortverhalten...; 2014; Krug, G., Kriwy, P., Carstensen, J.
- Methods and systems for managing an online opinion survey service; 2014; Mcloughlin, M. H., Seton, N., Blesy, K.
- Mobile Technologies for Conducting, Augmenting and Potentially Replacing Surveys: Report of the AAPOR...; 2014; Link, M. W., Murphy, J., Schober, M. F., Buskirk, T. D., Childs, J. H., Tesfaye, C.
- The use of within-subject experiments for estimating measurement effects in mixed-mode surveys ; 2014; Klausch, L. T., Schouten, B., Hox, J.
- Measuring well-being: An analysis of different response scales; 2014; van Beuningen, J., van der Houwen, K., Moonen, L.
- The impact of contact effort and interviewer performance on mode-specific nonresponse and measurement...; 2014; Schouten, B., Cobben, F., van der Laan, J., Arends, J.
- Community Life Survey: Summary of web experiment findings; 2013
- The Short-term Campaign Panel of the German Longitudinal Election Study 2009. Design, Implementation...; 2013; Steinbrecher, M., Rossmann, J.
- Too Fast, Too Straight, Too Weird: Post Hoc Identification of Meaningless Data in Internet ; 2013; Leiner, D. J.
- Postal recruitment into a longitudinal online panel survey. The effects of different number of reminder...; 2013; Martinsson, J.
- The world in 2013. ICT facts and figures; 2013
- Microsoft Security Intelligence Report, Volume 15; 2013
- A Comparison of Results from a Spanish and English Mail Survey: Effects of Instruction Placement on...; 2013; Wang, K., Sha, M.
- Research Note: Reducing the Threat of Sensitive Questions in Online Surveys?; 2013; Couper, M. P.
- Global market research 2013; 2013
- Exploring the Digital Nation: America’s Emerging Online Experience; 2013
- Advantages of a global multimodal print & digital readership survey; 2013; Cour, N., Saint-Joanis, G.
- Australia: building a 21st century readership survey; 2013; Green, A., White, H.
- The new swiss national readership survey: fit for the future ; 2013; Amschler, H., Hoffmann, J.
- ESS Mixed Mode Experiment Results in Estonia (CAWI and CAPI Mode Sequential Design); 2013; Ainsaar, M., Lilleoja, L., Lumiste, K., Roots, A.
- Using smartphones in survey research: a multifunctional tool Implementation of a time use app; a feasability...; 2013; Sonck, N., Fernee, H.
- Adaptive survey designs to minimize survey mode effects. A case study on the Dutch Labour Force Survey...; 2013; Calinescu, M., Schouten, B.
- Optimal Resource Allocation in Adaptive Survey Designs; 2013; Calinescu, M.